Library Special Collections Blog
Back to the Future: The Aesthetics of Digitization vs. the Aesthetics of Administration
The Los Angeles Aqueduct Digital Platform (LAADP) is situated within larger efforts, both at UCLA and beyond, to develop digitally-based means of organizing, presenting, and analyzing historical source material. These strategies go by many names - digital humanities, digital collections, OpenCourseWare, etc. - but they share the aim of developing a new informational aesthetic with equal emphases on dynamism, engagement, and centralization. This "aesthetics of digitization", a scholarly appeal of our age, is implicitly positioned against a more culturally-entrenched form of informational presentation, the "aesthetics of administration", a bureaucratic affect primed on ordered rows of archival boxes under fluorescent lights, amidst no-nonsense architectural décor, containing documents upon documents without clear hierarchical distinction. Defined by the historian Benjamin Buchloh in his 1990 essay, "Conceptual Art 1962-1969: From the Aesthetics of Administration to the Critique of Institutions", the administration-aesthetic, as a cultural phenomenon, reached its apotheosis in the postwar culture of the 1950s-1970s, amidst the bureaucratic onslaught spurred in part by various interdisciplinary initiatives and think-tank models. Tellingly, this aesthetic found its purest life in new modes of art practice during that era, termed "Conceptual art" for their emphasis on process, idea, and information over visually compelling form.
Los Angeles City Municipal Archives: Entrance
To be clear: the aesthetics of administration is historical opponent to the aesthetics of digitization. It is inefficient, banal, ugly, disorganized, sprawling, unwelcoming, overwhelming, at times inhumane. It plays the barren labyrinth to digitization's sleek and ever-new skyscraper of knowledge. And its sense of space is entirely alien to the laptop screen in more literal ways: think windowless buildings, monumental in the bad way, containing mostly "behind-the-scenes" storage warehouses complemented by charmless and cramped reading rooms.
We might thus be tempted to dismiss, with gratitude, the obsolescing of these older places, and of the taxing research protocols they demand. Certainly this is the implicit call of many recent university-based research initiatives - a model of totally linear progress, with the new emphasis on speed, mobility, and convenience signaling an upgrade over the archive-behemoths of old. But accepting such narratives would be a mistake, a willful overlooking of the ways that sited and digitized, real-space and virtual-space, old-fangled and future research methods coexist and intermix within our scholarly Zeitgeist.
L.A. City Municipal Archives Building: View from Union Station
Take, for example, the LAADP in the archival context of Los Angeles institutions. In-depth engagement with the Platform's digitized original source material and scholarship provides a framework for understanding the historical, cultural, social, political and economic context of 20th century L.A. water infrastructure, but in order to realize that framework's full potential one must follow research cues that lead elsewhere, and perhaps historically backwards - to the spaces of the administration-aesthetic. Which is to say, the story that the LAADP tells - of a vast engineering endeavor undergirded by a complex civic and bureaucratic apparatus - is necessarily a sited story. It takes up space. And it is still actualized, in part, within the halls of administration.
And so I took the cues; I read the scholarly ciphers for what I thought them to be. And sure enough they led me to vast warehouses, industrial yards, awkward architectural behemoths, file boxes without hierarchy, nondescript rooms under fluorescent lights, gray worktables. The itinerary had site-specific value: in these spaces, the history of the Aqueduct appeared richly elaborated yet urgently incomplete, capable of unfolding according to an infinite number of contradictions and sidebars. The peculiarity and difficulty of the experience underlined its potential, in other words.
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Records Center: Context, with Records Center at Right
At the L.A. City Municipal Archives (set atop a vast police garage and auto shop on the fringes of downtown) and the L.A. Department of Water and Power Records Center (set amidst an East L.A. industrial yard bordering an emergent above-ground metro line), I studied the complete construction reports of the Aqueduct, administrative files from the various departments within the Aqueduct Bureau, the full run of reports by Aqueduct engineers to L.A. city administration, scrapbooks on early-20th century L.A. water culture. Within these archives, typewritten texts were annotated and amended by the pens of William Mulholland and Joseph B. Lippincott, key players in the project's conception and execution. These documents summed not so much to a historical snapshot as a rough historical taxonomy. More firmly securing the categories of information according to their relative research-value would require further visits, driven by other questions.
What did these archives offer? They delineated an expanded cultural and physical geography of the city, forcing engagement with sidelined places that felt remote from the centers of official culture. They forced consideration of these places as essential to the city, substantial within its informational infrastructure. They delivered the sited experience of sited knowledge--both through the persons of the archivists themselves, and in the organization of the archival materials; these documents upon documents were not arranged solely according to the cold, rote logic of chronological or thematic structure, although they purported themselves to be. Organization was shown to be a form of knowledge-production within the archives, but also a form of criticism and historical analysis. No archive is neutral. Lastly, I arrived in the course of this work at a more deeply-registered sense of the Aqueduct's oft-discussed scale (historical, infrastructural, physical, financial, administrative, archival). In its spatiotemporal span, the Aqueduct touched on many categories of socio-cultural production, articulating them along the path from one place to another and from then to now. The encounter in the archives was with the dimensions of that megaproject, in its historical situation relative to our own.
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Records Center: Reference Room
---
By Nico Machida, Research Scholar for the Los Angeles Aqueduct Digital Platform in the Center for Primary Research and Training
Library Special Collections
UCLA Library Special Collections Blog
Archives
- November 2022 (1)
- October 2022 (2)
- September 2022 (2)
- August 2022 (1)
- May 2022 (2)
- December 2021 (1)
- November 2021 (2)
- October 2021 (2)
- September 2021 (2)
- August 2021 (1)
- April 2021 (5)
- March 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (1)
- September 2020 (1)
- August 2020 (1)
- May 2020 (2)
- April 2020 (2)
- January 2020 (3)
- September 2019 (2)
- August 2019 (3)
- July 2019 (2)
- April 2019 (2)
- March 2019 (1)
- December 2018 (4)
- October 2018 (2)
- May 2018 (1)
- March 2018 (2)
- October 2017 (1)
- September 2017 (1)
- June 2017 (3)
- May 2017 (5)
- April 2017 (2)
- March 2017 (1)
- February 2017 (2)
- January 2017 (2)
- December 2016 (3)
- November 2016 (2)
- October 2016 (2)
- September 2016 (1)
- July 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (1)
- December 2015 (3)
- November 2015 (3)
- October 2015 (1)
- September 2015 (2)
- July 2015 (1)
- June 2015 (5)
- May 2015 (4)
- April 2015 (5)
- March 2015 (6)
- February 2015 (7)
- January 2015 (2)
- December 2014 (3)
- November 2014 (3)
- October 2014 (2)
- September 2014 (3)
- August 2014 (6)
- July 2014 (4)
- June 2014 (2)
- May 2014 (3)
- April 2014 (7)
- March 2014 (2)
- February 2014 (5)
- January 2014 (2)
- November 2013 (3)
- October 2013 (6)
- September 2013 (4)
- August 2013 (5)
- July 2013 (2)
- June 2013 (5)
- May 2013 (5)
- April 2013 (3)
- March 2013 (3)
- February 2013 (3)
- January 2013 (1)
- December 2012 (3)
- November 2012 (2)
- October 2012 (2)
- September 2012 (3)
- August 2012 (3)
- July 2012 (2)
- June 2012 (4)
- May 2012 (2)
- April 2012 (5)
- March 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (5)
- January 2012 (6)
- November 2011 (3)
- October 2011 (4)
- July 2011 (1)
- April 2011 (1)
- March 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (1)
- October 2010 (1)